(no subject)
Sep. 2nd, 2005 05:42 pmMy worries about the doctor were pointless. Our scale is indeed inaccurate - off by at least 3 lbs, which makes a huge difference when 3 lbs is about 10% of your body weight, you know?
The care was much like we received from Sutter when I was pregnant (same facility, different department) - he was friendly, told us his opinion but didn't lecture, and was generally in and out as fast as possible. Leif didn't even get undressed.
I admit that I do find this a bit disconcerting, and it's one of the reasons I'd consider going with a homebirth midwife rather than Sutter next time. They're very nice and all, but it always leaves me feeling that something was missing.
He did say one interesting thing - when we expressed that we didn't want Leif to get the chicken pox vaccine*, he said that he felt it was mainly for the convenience of the parents, anyways. Wow. He wasn't anti-vaccination, mind you - he was pretty strongly in favor of the polio and pertussis vaccines, for instance. But that's an interesting take on it, especially to hear from a doctor.
Leif just stuck a band-aid on my scabby knee (bike crash the other day). I could melt :)
* Even for people generally in favor of vaccination, the chicken pox vaccine is often a different story. It has an unknown lifespan, and chicken pox infection in adults is generally much more serious than it is for children. I'd rather he get lifelong immunity by getting it naturally than risk a more serious infection later, especially given that serious chicken pox complications are rare in healthy kids.
The care was much like we received from Sutter when I was pregnant (same facility, different department) - he was friendly, told us his opinion but didn't lecture, and was generally in and out as fast as possible. Leif didn't even get undressed.
I admit that I do find this a bit disconcerting, and it's one of the reasons I'd consider going with a homebirth midwife rather than Sutter next time. They're very nice and all, but it always leaves me feeling that something was missing.
He did say one interesting thing - when we expressed that we didn't want Leif to get the chicken pox vaccine*, he said that he felt it was mainly for the convenience of the parents, anyways. Wow. He wasn't anti-vaccination, mind you - he was pretty strongly in favor of the polio and pertussis vaccines, for instance. But that's an interesting take on it, especially to hear from a doctor.
Leif just stuck a band-aid on my scabby knee (bike crash the other day). I could melt :)
* Even for people generally in favor of vaccination, the chicken pox vaccine is often a different story. It has an unknown lifespan, and chicken pox infection in adults is generally much more serious than it is for children. I'd rather he get lifelong immunity by getting it naturally than risk a more serious infection later, especially given that serious chicken pox complications are rare in healthy kids.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-03 04:30 am (UTC)With that being said, I think some vaccines do make quite a lot of sense, just because the potential consequences are so dire. Polio and pertussis come to mind (pertussis has had a bit of a resurgence lately); measles and mumps are also pretty gruesome. The good part is that the herd immunity phenomena does confer some statistical resistance even to those who haven't been vaccinated.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-03 05:55 am (UTC)The US is a little wonky in this respect. Compare the US, UK, and Japanese vaccination schedules. By the age of 2, a child receiving vaccines on the standard schedule in the US will have received 21 different injections. In the UK, 3. In Japan, 8. Admittedly, this is not entirely comparable, as the shots are combined in different manners. But in general, children in other 1st world countries are receiving significantly less in the way of vaccinations at a young age, without a negative effect on health.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-03 01:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-03 03:29 pm (UTC)But yeah, I think that the big immunization push in the US is aimed more at daycare kids.
And then there's the Hepatitis B vaccine, which they give just after birth, regardless of whether the mom is at risk for Hep B or not. That's just silly - there's basically no way a baby is going to get it unless their mom passes it to them. It's kind of like the eyedrops to protect against STD infection. They just give it regardless.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-05 05:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-05 06:43 pm (UTC)I also can't give blood for 4 months. I wish I'd thought about that before, so I could have gone ahead and donated first.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-03 06:20 am (UTC)At least that's how I was raised. Maybe people are more paranoid about disease and health nowadays... I also grew up with rusty and pointy Tonka trucks in a mudpit as part of my play area. I think that would get child protective services involved now. Especially if they saw the fort we built between two trees on an empty lot. But then, I can use a miter box and know how to measure for the saw blade width as a result.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-03 06:36 am (UTC)The nice thing about the vaccine is that it has slowed it down enough that we can probably pick and choose the year we're going to do it. This year doesn't seem good because he isn't quite verbal enough. When he's 4 or so would probably be a better.