Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
ocelot: (Default)
[personal profile] ocelot
The people I lived with in 2000/2001 got a phone call for me from someone named Bernard, saying he had to talk to me, and it was very important.

He's apparently a lawyer for the apartment complex I lived at in Davis. They claim I owe them $800 something for ending the lease early/cleaning expenses/etc. They'll settle for $650 if we can pay it by the end of February, or we can pay $100 per month and take a credit hit.

This is the first we've heard about this. We moved out at the end of May.

California rental law requires them to notify us of these expenses within 21 days of leaving. They claim they sent mail to our old address, which we had forwarded to Virginia. We never received it. Perhaps they never sent it, perhaps there was a mixup in the mail system.

I question whether this would be considered proper notification.

I'm pretty certain I gave them a real forwarding address, either the PO Box or Christof's work address. Even if I didn't, they had our new phone number, as they called it on multiple occasions about other issues.

Whatever the case, I'm pissed off, and hope something gets worked out. I have no problem with paying what we owe, but it's going to be difficult to manage on this short notice. I'll be especially pissed if AOL won't cover the early termination fee because of the delay.

Hopefully this is just all lawyer fast talk, and if we call them on it, they'll back down. Bernard-jerk certainly wasn't giving me much chance to get a word in edgewise, for all his talk of wanting to sort things out.

The random expenses really need to stop.

Oh well. At least I can stop losing sleep wondering what the phone calls were about (I've known he was calling since Wednesday, but was only able to call today due to phone number mixups and time zone differences).

Date: 2004-02-13 07:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mactavish.livejournal.com
I can't imagine it being proper notification. If they can prove they contacted you, good -- but I'll bet they can't.

Date: 2004-02-13 07:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arazia.livejournal.com
I agree with the previous post. They have to show proof that they had used all possible means to contact you. Obviously they had your phone number, and they could have done so. Leave it up to them to show the proof of that. Otherwise, they can go suck on stale cheese.

Date: 2004-02-13 07:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fiorebrilliante.livejournal.com
Let me know if he starts more trouble. I'm pretty well-versed in landlord-tenant law, and I can research the relevant California law if you need.

Re:

Date: 2004-02-14 04:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] darthgeek.livejournal.com
I can vouch for kelly's law-fu :) She helped us take the wind out of our ex-landlady's sails :)

Date: 2004-02-13 08:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shwin.livejournal.com
I don't think they have anything to use against you. They had their 21 days. Did they send the mail via certified mail??? I doubt it if they waited this long and also had your phone number.

Re:

Date: 2004-02-13 08:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] therealocelot.livejournal.com
I don't know how they sent it. I can't imagine it really matters if they were sending it to an address they knew we weren't at.

Profile

ocelot: (Default)
ocelot

April 2011

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627 282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jan. 18th, 2026 07:14 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios