Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Date: 2006-05-21 01:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rubbrduckage.livejournal.com
Wow, this is really making the rounds. I've seen it on from a number of different circles on my FL. They had no idea what they were starting there, eh?

Date: 2006-05-21 02:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yndy.livejournal.com
um... what does GIP stand for?

Date: 2006-05-21 02:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] therealocelot.livejournal.com
Gratuitous Icon Post - a post made for the primary purpose of displaying a new icon.

And a gratuitous icon comment....

Date: 2006-05-24 03:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cymrullewes.livejournal.com
(you haven't met this person yet.... and won't as she's 2 years beyond this stage)

Will my account be yanked/suspended because of it?

Re: And a gratuitous icon comment....

Date: 2006-05-24 03:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] therealocelot.livejournal.com
I don't think so. The word from LJ so far is that breastfeeding icons are ok as long as the nipple and areola aren't showing (presumably because having to get rid of any icon with any slight bit of boob showing would be a huge job), and it isn't really clear what's showing. But it might, I don't know.

Date: 2006-05-21 03:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] live-momma.livejournal.com
I received a form letter response. *eye roll*

Date: 2006-05-21 09:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] therealocelot.livejournal.com
Was it the one that tried to claim that it wasn't the same as nursing in public, because in public a parent could cover the child's eyes?

Grrr. I actually wasn't taking it all that seriously until that absolutely idiotic reply.

Date: 2006-05-22 04:03 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
no one wants to see your tit, period.
even if you are feeding your child with it.

Profile

ocelot: (Default)
ocelot

April 2011

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627 282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jan. 9th, 2026 08:54 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios