(Disclaimer: This scenario is in no way related to my own life. I'm just curious, because I've seen this issue pop up in multiple locations now, so it seems to be a fairly common way of thinking.)
Partner A and B are an opposite-sex couple in a committed, up-to-this-point-monogamous relationship. For the sake of simplicity of explaining (and because this is how it has been in the situations I've seen so far), A is female and B is male. Partner A is bisexual, and partner B is heterosexual.
Partner A decides that she would like to explore her bisexual side and have an encounter/relationship/whatever with another female. Partner B says "Sure, if I can do the same with a female."
Partner A logs onto the internet, explains the situation, and says that this is unfair. She would happily let Partner B have a relationship with another male, though. Multiple people agree that it is unfair, and allowing him to also have a homosexual side-relationship is an adequate solution.
Disregarding any issues of the morality or practicality of an open and/or same-sex relationship... What's your opinion of the situation? Is it fair for Partner B to request the same freedom with a member of the opposite sex? Is Partner A's solution of giving the freedom to explore with a member of the same sex fair, considering that Partner A does not actually have interest in exploring with a member of the same sex?
(If you can't disregard the morality/practicality, don't feel you have to answer. Or answer if you want, anyways. I'm just procrastinating. I'm tempted to post to Booju, too.)
Partner A and B are an opposite-sex couple in a committed, up-to-this-point-monogamous relationship. For the sake of simplicity of explaining (and because this is how it has been in the situations I've seen so far), A is female and B is male. Partner A is bisexual, and partner B is heterosexual.
Partner A decides that she would like to explore her bisexual side and have an encounter/relationship/whatever with another female. Partner B says "Sure, if I can do the same with a female."
Partner A logs onto the internet, explains the situation, and says that this is unfair. She would happily let Partner B have a relationship with another male, though. Multiple people agree that it is unfair, and allowing him to also have a homosexual side-relationship is an adequate solution.
Disregarding any issues of the morality or practicality of an open and/or same-sex relationship... What's your opinion of the situation? Is it fair for Partner B to request the same freedom with a member of the opposite sex? Is Partner A's solution of giving the freedom to explore with a member of the same sex fair, considering that Partner A does not actually have interest in exploring with a member of the same sex?
(If you can't disregard the morality/practicality, don't feel you have to answer. Or answer if you want, anyways. I'm just procrastinating. I'm tempted to post to Booju, too.)
no subject
Date: 2009-08-19 03:37 am (UTC)I agree with this. However, saying "You can sleep with a man" when she know he'll do nothing of the sort seems like a similar form of passive aggression.
Kind of like going to the store to get dessert to share, and grabbing chocolate ice cream knowing the person you're sharing with hates chocolate.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-19 05:33 am (UTC)